175 lines
4.7 KiB
Rust
175 lines
4.7 KiB
Rust
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
|
|
/* origin: musl src/math/ceilf.c */
|
|
|
|
//! Generic `ceil` algorithm.
|
|
//!
|
|
//! Note that this uses the algorithm from musl's `ceilf` rather than `ceil` or `ceill` because
|
|
//! performance seems to be better (based on icount) and it does not seem to experience rounding
|
|
//! errors on i386.
|
|
|
|
use crate::support::{Float, FpResult, Int, IntTy, MinInt, Status};
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
pub fn ceil<F: Float>(x: F) -> F {
|
|
ceil_status(x).val
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
pub fn ceil_status<F: Float>(x: F) -> FpResult<F> {
|
|
let zero = IntTy::<F>::ZERO;
|
|
|
|
let mut ix = x.to_bits();
|
|
let e = x.exp_unbiased();
|
|
|
|
// If the represented value has no fractional part, no truncation is needed.
|
|
if e >= F::SIG_BITS as i32 {
|
|
return FpResult::ok(x);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let status;
|
|
let res = if e >= 0 {
|
|
// |x| >= 1.0
|
|
let m = F::SIG_MASK >> e.unsigned();
|
|
if (ix & m) == zero {
|
|
// Portion to be masked is already zero; no adjustment needed.
|
|
return FpResult::ok(x);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, raise an inexact exception.
|
|
status = Status::INEXACT;
|
|
|
|
if x.is_sign_positive() {
|
|
ix += m;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ix &= !m;
|
|
F::from_bits(ix)
|
|
} else {
|
|
// |x| < 1.0, raise an inexact exception since truncation will happen (unless x == 0).
|
|
if ix & F::SIG_MASK == F::Int::ZERO {
|
|
status = Status::OK;
|
|
} else {
|
|
status = Status::INEXACT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if x.is_sign_negative() {
|
|
// -1.0 < x <= -0.0; rounding up goes toward -0.0.
|
|
F::NEG_ZERO
|
|
} else if ix << 1 != zero {
|
|
// 0.0 < x < 1.0; rounding up goes toward +1.0.
|
|
F::ONE
|
|
} else {
|
|
// +0.0 remains unchanged
|
|
x
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
FpResult::new(res, status)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
mod tests {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use crate::support::Hexf;
|
|
|
|
/// Test against https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/math/ceil
|
|
fn spec_test<F: Float>(cases: &[(F, F, Status)]) {
|
|
let roundtrip = [
|
|
F::ZERO,
|
|
F::ONE,
|
|
F::NEG_ONE,
|
|
F::NEG_ZERO,
|
|
F::INFINITY,
|
|
F::NEG_INFINITY,
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
for x in roundtrip {
|
|
let FpResult { val, status } = ceil_status(x);
|
|
assert_biteq!(val, x, "{}", Hexf(x));
|
|
assert_eq!(status, Status::OK, "{}", Hexf(x));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for &(x, res, res_stat) in cases {
|
|
let FpResult { val, status } = ceil_status(x);
|
|
assert_biteq!(val, res, "{}", Hexf(x));
|
|
assert_eq!(status, res_stat, "{}", Hexf(x));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Skipping f16 / f128 "sanity_check"s due to rejected literal lexing at MSRV */
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
#[cfg(f16_enabled)]
|
|
fn spec_tests_f16() {
|
|
let cases = [
|
|
(0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
];
|
|
spec_test::<f16>(&cases);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn sanity_check_f32() {
|
|
assert_eq!(ceil(1.1f32), 2.0);
|
|
assert_eq!(ceil(2.9f32), 3.0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn spec_tests_f32() {
|
|
let cases = [
|
|
(0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
];
|
|
spec_test::<f32>(&cases);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn sanity_check_f64() {
|
|
assert_eq!(ceil(1.1f64), 2.0);
|
|
assert_eq!(ceil(2.9f64), 3.0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn spec_tests_f64() {
|
|
let cases = [
|
|
(0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
];
|
|
spec_test::<f64>(&cases);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
#[cfg(f128_enabled)]
|
|
fn spec_tests_f128() {
|
|
let cases = [
|
|
(0.1, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.1, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(0.9, 1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-0.9, -0.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.1, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.1, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(1.9, 2.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
(-1.9, -1.0, Status::INEXACT),
|
|
];
|
|
spec_test::<f128>(&cases);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|